Wednesday, February 20, 2013

The Suffering of the Impassible God (Introduction)


The Suffering of the Impassible God: The Dialectics of Patristic Thought
The doctrine of divine (im)passibility piqued my interest the moment I first learned of it in Bible College. I even wrote a paper on the subject in Systematic Theology II (in which I argued against it). I simply could not understand how impassibility could ever have been accepted in the first place. I’m still trying to get it. That’s why I’m reading this book. It’s considered among the best books on the subject. I’m excited to finally be reading it. It’s my intention to take my time with this book, summarizing it and sharing my reflections here.

From what I can tell, this will be the best treatment of the Father's view of impassibility I’ve read so far. I believe it will fill gaps left by Weinandy’s Does God Suffer? and Hallman’s Descent of God. In the revised edition of The God Who Risks Sanders gave credit to Gavrilyuk for enlightening him on the seemingly self-contradictory patristic perspectives on (im)passibility

From impassibility to passibility
Gavrilyuk begins his book by acknowledging that most of today’s theologians accept the premise that God suffers. Though this view contradicts much church tradition, it has become the new orthodoxy.

According to Gavrilyuk, it has now become common to dismiss the patristic concept of apatheia without giving serious study to its function in the writings of the Fathers. The allegation that the Fathers were unduly influenced by Hellenistic philosophy has come to be taken for granted by many in contemporary theology. Gavrilyuk questions this new conventional wisdom (which he calls the “Theory of Theology’s Fall Into Hellenistic Philosophy”), refuting everyone from Adolf von Harnack and Abraham Heschel to Jurgen Moltmann and Joseph M. Hallman.

How much does God suffer?
He points out problems with unqualified Divine passibility. Unrestricted impassibility appears obviously unbiblical. But so does the other extreme. If God is utterly passible, we have problems. If that is true, then God is subject to all emotions. But certain emotions are clearly beneath the holiness of God (e.g. “greed, lust, fear, or anxiety”). It might also imply that God can be so overcome by emotion that he becomes helpless, which is obviously not true of the God of the Bible.

Gavrilyuk argues that in order for God to endure some forms of suffering he must have a body and soul or something like them. In order for God to suffer just as we do he must share a human nature. This resonates with patristic thinking.

Then there’s the question of whether, if God suffers, his suffering is voluntary or not. Few Christian theologians would want to argue that God cannot foresee and exercise sovereignty over any suffering that comes his way. There is nothing virtuous about suffering for no good reason. If God suffers he must suffer in a purposeful way (Paul Fiddes agrees).

Jesus loves me?
But what of compassion? Isn’t it the essence of compassion to ‘suffer-with’? Gavrilyuk spends some time on this point. He considers this part of the “archargument” against impassibility. If God is the loving God of providential care and compassion, how can we call him impassible?

Obviously, God acts compassionately. But Gavrilyuk argues that suffering is not a necessary part of compassion. Take the surgeon for example. His compassionate action of practicing surgery would only be weakened by entering into the suffering of his patient. Imagine a house on fire. People are suffering inside. A crowd gathers. Some members of the crowd begin to weep and howl. One even has a fit and passes out. Another sets herself ablaze in order to suffer with the people in the house. Then a man, unmoved by emotion, recognizes that the people need help, and, risking his own life, saves the people in the building from a fiery death. To Gavrilyuk, the question of who showed genuine compassion in this situation has an obvious answer – the rescuer.


This analysis of human compassion applies by way of analogy to the case of divine
compassion in the incarnation. Divine compassion presupposes both impassibility and passibility. It is the main contention of the patristic understanding of the incarnation that God, remaining fully divine, became human, accepted the limitations of human existence, subjected himself to voluntary suffering for the salvation of the world and triumphed over sin, death, and corruption in the end. God is impassible inasmuch as he is able to conquer suffering and he is passible inasmuch as he is able to suffer in and through human nature.

Closing thoughts (on the Introduction)
Though I’m not quite convinced by his arguments about compassion, I am certainly enjoying learning from this book. I was first introduced to the Theory of Theology’s Fall Into Hellenistic Philosophy while attending Bible College. There at the college library and online I found the Theory expounded by Open Theists (whose ideas captivated me at the time, and still do for that matter). It looks like this book is going to correct my thinking a bit. I’m glad for that, especially since I’ve come to respect the Fathers more since my Bible College days. It’ll be nice to be convinced that they were not self-contradicting or syncretistic when it came to the subject of divine pathos. 

If you have any thoughts on the subject please share them. I'm always eager to learn. 
Next post Chapter 1

Saturday, February 9, 2013

The New Faces of Christianity: Believing the Bible in the Global South

The New Faces of Christianity: Believing the Bible in the Global South

Christianity is increasingly moving to the global South. Africa, South America, and Asia are continuing to see vast numbers turn to Christianity while in North America and Western Europe numbers are stagnating or declining. What will this mean for the shape Christianity will take in the years to come?

In the thralls of the Fundamentalist/Modernist controversy Harry Fosdick asked, “Shall the fundamentalists win?” From Jenkins perspective the answer is clear – the fundamentalists did not win. But what about the Christianity of today and tomorrow? Will the fundamentalists win?

The Anglican church is a prominent example of the different approaches Northern and Southern Christians sometimes take to reading and applying the Bible. Anglicans in the South reject homosexual practices while Anglicans in the North accept those same practices – both based on their reading of Scripture.

Part of what makes it easier for Southern Christians to read the Bible more literally is their relative similarity to the cultures of the Bible. They can identify with the poverty, famine, oppression, competing religions, demon possession, and persecution found in the Bible in ways that many Western Europeans and North Americans cannot. The Bible was not written to a postmodern, postindustrial, and secular audience. It was written to people with much more in common with the people of modern day Zimbabwe than modern day England.

It may just be that the “fundamentalist” readings of the Two-Thirds World will remind North Americans and Europeans of the long forgotten traditions of Christianity. Belief in healing, demon possession, and miracles have been central to the ancient Christian faith. The new face of Christianity may well embrace those beliefs.



This is a fascinating book. Jenkins provides many specific examples of Southern readings of familiar texts. For example, Psalm 23 is used in exorcisms and to denounce oppressive regimes.

Though I didn’t enjoy this one as much as The Next Christendom, I’d still recommend this book. If you read the Bible somewhat like I do (call it “literally” if you like), if you believe there was a global flood, there are real demons, God supernaturally heals the sick, you may struggle to identify with Jenkin’s perspective. His own view gives valuable insight into common Western interpretations of Scripture – however novel and heterodox those readings may be. 

Tuesday, February 5, 2013

Should We Fear God?


Should we fear God?

Among the many old-fashioned beliefs once cherished by American Evangelicals is the conviction that people should “fear God.” Such talk can sound very strange to the neophyte or the non-theist. Some might respond with dismay, “You mean you worship a God you’re afraid of?”

Nowadays you don’t hear much said about fearing God – even from Evangelicals. Many churches are working hard to save the Christian faith from itself. Without a radical makeover, many believe that Christianity cannot survive. Just one of the many facets of the faith that many are seeking to correct is the seemingly outmoded idea that people should fear God.

Where did the idea of fearing God come from anyway?
I recently began a study of the biblical book of Proverbs. Just a few verses in I read what Derek Kidner calls the motto of the entire book, a statement about fearing God. “The fear of the LORD is the beginning of knowledge” (Proverbs 1:7). The first chapter goes on to personify wisdom as laughing at foolish people whose fears become realities (Proverbs 1:26-27). When destruction comes wisdom refuses to help those who did not “choose the fear of the LORD” (Proverbs 1:28-29). In chapter two the “fear of the Lord” is placed in parallel with the “knowledge of God” (Proverbs 2:5). The Proverbs have a lot to say about the fear of God (Proverbs 2:5; 3:7; 8:13; 9:10; 14:26; 14:27; 15:16; 15:33; 16:6; 19:23; 22:4; 23:17; 24:21). There’s even a promise that those who practice “fear of the Lord” will live long lives (Proverbs 10:27)!

Judging from the Old Testament book of Proverbs, the “fear of the LORD” is not a bad thing at all! What of the rest of the Old Testament?

Genesis 
In chapter 20 the patriarch Abraham is afraid that the men of a place will kill him and take his wife because “there is no fear of God in this place.” Apparently, the fear of God kept people from taking advantage of each other. God is called by the title “Fear of Isaac” (Genesis 31:42, 53). Joseph told his brothers that he feared God, expecting that claim to assure them that he would not treat them unfairly (Genesis 42:18).

One of the most intense stories of the whole book of Genesis, or the entire Bible for that matter, is the sacrifice of Isaac (Genesis 22:1-14). Abraham was commanded by God to offer his only son as a human sacrifice. This test of Abraham’s obedience served to prove one thing – Abraham feared God (Genesis 22:12). (Don’t worry; Abraham didn’t go through with it. God provided a substitute sacrifice).

Exodus 
In the time of Moses’ birth there was a standing order to kill all male Jewish babies. The midwives refused to conduct the infanticide because they “feared God” (Exodus 1:17, 21). While horrible plagues were being unleashed on the people of Egypt, some “feared the word of the LORD” and took steps to protect themselves from the coming judgments (Exodus 9:20). But Pharaoh did not “fear the LORD God” (Exodus 9:30). When Pharaoh and his army were drowned the watching Jews “feared the LORD” (Exodus 14:31). The new nation looked for certain qualities in its leaders – truthful men, haters of bribes, individuals who “fear God” (Exodus 18:21). Finally, in chapter 20, we see an interesting juxtaposition. Moses tells the Jewish nation not to fear. He then says that God is testing them so that they will continue to fear him and therefore refrain from sin (Exodus 20:20).

Deuteronomy
“Fear of God” is a prominent feature in the narrative (Deuteronomy 4:10; 6:2, 13, 24; 8:6; 10:12, 20; 13:4; 14:23; 17:19; 25:18; 28:58; 31:12-13).

Psalms
The song book of the Bible glories in the “fear of God” (Psalm 2:11; 15:4; 19:9; 22:23; 25:12, 14; 33:8, 18; 34:7, 9, 11; 36:1; etc.). The Psalmists correlate fearing God with rejoicing, protection, honor, righteousness, favor, beauty, and intimacy with God.

Ecclesiastes 
This book of ancient wisdom ends with the admonition, “fear God and keep His commandments, because this applies to every person. For God will bring every act to judgment, everything which is hidden, whether it is good or evil.” (Ecclesiastes 12:13-14).

Isaiah 
From start to finish, this book stresses the fear of the Lord (Isaiah 8:13; 11:2-3; 29:13, 23; 33:6; 50:10; 59:19; 63:17).

This cursory overview of the “fear of the Lord” in the Old Testament yields a rather incontestable result – fearing God is a good thing. But, what about the New Testament? After all, the New Testament is considered more relevant for today’s Christians than the Hebrew Bible.

Gospels
If anybody should know whether we should “fear God” it’s Jesus. He warned people to not fear humans. Instead, he encouraged people to fear God (Matthew 10:28; Luke 12:4-5).

Acts
The earliest Christians feared God (Acts 9:31). Gentiles who followed the Jewish religion (without becoming full proselytes) were known as “God fearers” (Acts 10:2; 13:16).

Romans
Paul quotes the Old Testament to paint a picture of humanity separated from God, “There is no fear of God before their eyes” (Romans 3:18).

2 Corinthians
Christians are urged that they should be “perfecting holiness in the fear of God” (2 Corinthians 7:1).

Ephesians
The “fear of God” is presented as a basis for Christian unity (Ephesians 5:21).

Hebrews
According to the Hebrews writer, the proper way to worship God is with “godly fear” (Hebrews 12:28).

1 Peter
Peter urges Christians to “fear God” (1 Peter 2:17).

Revelation
The Bible ends like it begins, with the “fear of God.” Those who fear God receive rewards (Revelation 11:18). An angel preaches to the people of the earth that it is time to “Fear God” (Revelation 14:7). Who can help but fear God (Rev. 15:4)? It is those who fear God who praise him and enjoy a meal with God at the end of time (Rev. 19:5).

How should we understand the phrase “fear of God”?
The words translated as ‘fear’ in some English Bibles are more flexible than our common usage of the English term. Biblical ‘fear’ can include not only terror and being afraid, but profound respect and awe. 

Typically, when the Bible speaks of the “fear of God” it is describing or prescribing an attitude within God’s own people. The primary idea isn’t that God’s people should be afraid of God. But that we should be afraid to be on God’s bad side. And everyone should maintain a deep and profound reverence for God.

Why fear God?
The Bible contains many promises for those who fear God. The blessings of the fear of God extend to society at large. A community with healthy respect for God is less oppressive than societies without the fear of God. When people don’t fear God they tend to oppress the weak. As the Bible puts it, they “curse the deaf” and “put a stumbling block in front of the blind” (Leviticus 19:14).

Fear of God leads to a good life, a life of obedience to God’s good laws. Refusal of the fear of God inevitably leads to sinful folly that will just as inevitably be ultimately regretted on the Day of Judgment. God is the final judge. Recognition of his authority to sentence sinners ought to make any sensible person think twice about breaking his laws. 

But isn’t God the God of Love?
And we have come to know and have believed the love which God has for us. God is love, and the one who abides in love abides in God, and God abides in him.  By this, love is perfected with us, that we may have confidence in the day of judgment; because as He is, so also are we in this world.  There is no fear in love; but perfect love casts out fear, because fear involves punishment, and the one who fears is not perfected in love.  We love, because He first loved us.  
                                                                                                     - 1 John 4:16-19

“Amazing Grace” is still a popular hymn, even among many of the Christians who are working to rid Christianity of the fear of God (which they see as an outdated understanding). It includes the lines “T’was grace that taught my heart to fear. And grace, my fears relieved.” These lyrics seem to echo the ancient words of the apostle John, “perfect love casts out fear.”

Every one of us has done dirty stuff. Awareness of our guilt, and the punishment that awaits us, is a wonderful gift from God. We become afraid because we know that we haven’t lived like Jesus.

The good news is that God’s grace doesn’t leave us in our fear. God’s love changes us. Because God lavished his love on us when we were still criminals we come to love him. As his love enters us and grows we are transformed into new people – people who live like Jesus. Being made perfect in love means living like Jesus “in this world.” Those who live like Jesus need not have any fear of punishment. Rather, we go to the judgment boldly. We long to see the God we reverence and love face to face.

Reclaiming a rejected teaching
The God of the Bible is no joke. He will not be mocked. When the world became full of violence he wiped out the human race with a flood (sparing just 8 people). He has sent calamity, diseases, tornadoes, and fire from heaven to punish those who did not choose the fear of the Lord. There is coming a day when every human action will be brought into judgment. For most that will be a day of horror.

Those who turn to Jesus in repentance, becoming his disciples, can go to the Day of Judgment boldly. For us, death has lost its sting. Love is waiting.

It’s time for those of us who recognize the authority of Scripture to choose and spread the “fear of God.” This proper attitude toward God brings many blessings. Spread the joy to those around you. Encourage everyone you know to choose the fear of God.

  







Wednesday, January 30, 2013

Studying the Proverbs with Derek Kidner




Derek Kidner’s commentary on Proverbs, part of the Tyndale Old Testament Commentary series, has been one of the most popular companions to the book of Proverbs for decades now. I’d heard that the introduction was worth the price of the book and, now that I’ve read it, I must agree. His introduction has whet my appetite to begin a fresh study of the book of Proverbs.

I've summarized his introduction largely for my own benefit. Summarizing helps me remember. Hopefully it will benefit you as well. I must warn you that there was no way to shorten Kidner's writing without losing essential stuff. He doesn't waste words. If something seems lacking or doesn't make sense don't blame Kidner! 
Proverbs presents us with “one criterion, which could be summed up in the question, ‘Is this wisdom or folly?’ This is a unifying approach to life, because it suits the most commonplace realms as fully as the most exalted.” 

Wisdom is an ancient part of both Israelite and other Ancient Near Eastern cultures. Several centuries before Abraham, the Egyptians produced The Teaching Ptahhotep. The Babylonians also wrote wisdom literature, such as ‘The Babylonian Job’ or ‘The Babylonian Ecclesiastes’, from ancient times.

The fatherly introduction to the book of Proverbs (1:1-9:18) is a fitting preparation for the reader to receive instruction from Solomon (10:1-22:16). The words of wise men follow (22:17-24:22) and then even more words of wise men (24:23-34). Next comes more proverbs of Solomon (Hezekiah’s collection 25:1-29:27), the words of Agur (30:1-33) and King Lemuel (31:1-9). The book ends with the anonymous ode to “wifely excellence” (31:10-31).

Subject-studies
God and man
A glance through the book of Proverbs could lead one to suppose that the book is rather generic in its approach to religion. Upon further examination it becomes clear that Proverbs is quite specific in regards to God.

Without the fear of the Lord, there is no wisdom (9:10). No one can be wise without also being godly, or godly without being wise (8:1-36). Sin is very real in Proverbs. And it can’t be dealt with through “subpersonal transactions” (15:8; 21:27; 28:9). Only honest confession and practical repentance can sin be put away (16:6; 28:13).

Of the 100 mentions of God in the book all but 12 use the name Yahweh – the personal name God revealed to Israel through Moses. It is no generic term.

Prudence never trumps faith. Proverbs counsels us to trust God more than our own understanding (3:5,7).  

Planning is extoled (20:18). But God’s will overrules all human plans (19:21).

Wisdom
What it is
-          Instruction, or training: disciple – “giving notice at once that wisdom will be hard-won, a quality of character as much as mind.”
-          Understanding, or insight: sense or discernment
-          Wise dealing: practical wisdom
-          Shrewdness and discretion: wisdom to plan your course realistically
-          Knowledge and learning: Knowledge primarily of God and learning emphasizing that “doctrine is something given and received, or grasped.”
How to get it
Wisdom is available to anyone! But it is not attained easily.
-          Conversion: turning from evil and to the light
-          Devotion: “Wisdom is for the humbly eager”

The fool
-          The Simple: This person is “easily led, gullible, silly.” He is naïve (14:15). “Morally, he is willful and irresponsible” (1:32). His problem is not lack of intellect. It is a lack of willingness to “accept discipline in the school of wisdom (1:22-32).”
-          The Fool: Again, the problem is not mental inability but poor choices. Fools lack the concentration and desire required of those who would gain wisdom. They give their ill-formed opinions freely (15:2), making clear to all hearers that they are fools (13:16). Yet fools will not countenance the possibility that they could be wrong (17:10). They love their own folly (26:11). Fools are a menace. When possible, they should be avoided (14:7; 17:12; 10:23; 18:6; 29:11; 13:20; 26:6; 10:1; 17:21, 25; 19:13; 15:20).

The scoffer
-          The Lord scorns the scorners (3:34). The scoffer is another fellow with a deep heart problem. He loves to criticize but refuses to receive correction (9:7-8; 13:1; 15:12; 21:24; 22:10; 29:8).

The sluggard
(This section is so excellent and convicting (at least for me) that I’ll simply quote it verbatim.)
1. The sluggard’s character
The sluggard in Proverbs is a figure of tragi-comedy, with his sheer animal laziness (he is more than anchored to his bed: he is hinged to it, 26:14), his preposterous excuses (‘there is a lion outside!’ 26:13; 22:13) and his final helplessness.
1. He will not begin things. When we ask him (6:9, 10) ‘How long …?’ ‘When …?’, we are being too definite for him. He doesn’t know. All he knows is his delicious drowsiness; all he asks is a little respite: ‘a little … a little … a little …’. He does not commit himself to a refusal, but deceives himself by the smallness of his surrenders. So, by inches and minutes, his opportunity slips away.
2. He will not finish things. The rare effort of beginning has been too much; the impulse dies. So his quarry goes bad on him (12:27, av, rv; see commentary) and his meal goes cold on him (19:24; 26:15).
3. He will not face things. He comes to believe his own excuses (perhaps there is a lion out there, 22:13), and to rationalize his laziness; for he is ‘wiser in his own conceit than seven men that can render a reason’ (26:16). Because he makes a habit of the soft choice (he ‘will not plow by reason of the cold’, 20:4, av—see commentary) his character suffers as much as his business, so that he is implied in 15:19 (see commentary) to be fundamentally dishonest. (A suggestion of the way he would describe himself is made in the commentary on 26:13–16.)
4. Consequently he is restless (13:4; 21:25, 26) with unsatisfied desire; helpless in face of the tangle of his affairs, which are like a ‘hedge of thorns’ (15:19); and useless—expensively (18:9) and exasperatingly (10:26)—to any who must employ him.
2. The sluggard’s lesson
1. By example. The locus classicus is 6:6ff.: ‘Go to the ant …’—for he shames the sluggard twice over. First, in needing no ‘overseer’ (7), whereas he must be prodded; he waits for it, resigned and defensive. Secondly, in ‘knowing the time’. To him, all time is alike: summer and harvest (8) suggest long, languorous days (cf. 10:5), rather than the time of crisis in which the year’s work will be crowned or cancelled, and the battle with winter decided (cf. Jer. 8:20). Like the pharaoh of Jeremiah 46:17, ‘he hath let the appointed time pass by’; like the slumbering watchmen of Isaiah 56:9–12, his motto is ‘tomorrow shall be as to-day was, and braver, braver yet!’ (Knox’s translation).
2. By experience. This lesson comes too late. He will suddenly wake to find that poverty has arrived (‘like a vagabond, … like an armed man’, 6:11, rsv), and there is no arguing with it. Through shirking hard work he has qualified for drudgery (just when his too energetic friend has risen to more rewarding duties, 12:24); and through procrastination the disorder of his life has become irreversible: all is wasteland (24:30, 31).
‘Then I beheld, and considered well: I saw, and received instruction’ (24:32). The wise man will learn while there is time. He knows that the sluggard is no freak, but, as often as not, an ordinary man who has made too many excuses, too many refusals and too many postponements. It has all been as imperceptible, and as pleasant, as falling asleep.[1]

The friend
The word commonly translated ‘friend’ can just as well mean ‘neighbor.’ It bears the roughly the same range of meaning as ‘fellow.’
Marks of a good neighbor:
-          Peaceful (3:29; 25:8-9)
-          Kind (24:17, 19; 25:21-22)
-          Quite rather than critical (11:12)
-          Merciful (14:21)
-          Unpopular with wicked people (21:10)
Marks of a good friend:
-          Constancy (18:24; 17:17; 27:10)
-          Candor (27:6; 28:23)
-          Counsel (27:9; 27:17)
-          Tact (25:17; 27:14; 25:20; 26:18-19)

Words
Words have great power. They can minister life or they can bring destruction. It is by words that our relationships are developed and our ideas formed. Yet words have their limits. They can never replace action. They can never make a lie true. And words can never force anyone to listen, believer, or obey.
Marks of good words:
-          Honest (16:13; 24:26)
-          Few (17:28; 13:3; 11:12-13; 10:19)
-          Calm (17:27; 18:13; 15:1; 25:15)
-          Apt (15:23; 10:20; 25:11)
To be a person who speaks good words you must:
-          Study (15:2, 28; 2:6)
-          Develop character (4:23; 10:20; cf. Mat 12:34)

The family
Husband and wife
-          Though kings married multiple wives, the average Israelite marriage included only one man and one woman. There are proverbs addressing all kinds of marital issues (from unfaithfulness to nagging) there’s nothing in the book about the discord of polygamous marriage.
-          Both parents share the responsibility of raising children (1:8,9; 6:20, etc.).
-          The “man is urged to be not merely loyal but ardent, ‘ravished always with her love’ (5:19).
-          A wise woman adds stability to a family (14:1).
-          Sexual sin has dire consequences (lost honor 5:9; 6:33; lost liberty 23:27-28; lost years 5:9, 11; lost possessions 29:3; 6:26; lost life 2:18-19; burned (6:27-29).
Parents and children
-          If children must suffer in order to learn wisdom it is worth it (13:24; 8:35-36; 23:14; 22:15; 29:15).
-          Children need to be taught the ‘law’ by their parents (3:1; 7:2)
-          Unfortunately, some refuse to learn (13:1). Good parents sometimes produce idle (10:5), loose (29:3), despising (15:20), mocking (30:17), or cursing children 30:11; 20:20) who bring them shame. Wise children bring their parents honor (10:1; 13:1; 15:20).

Life and death
Life
-          Material and social: ‘life’ can refer to success (16:15) and ‘live’ can refer to enjoying harmonious family relations (15:27)
-          Personal or psychological: ‘life’ can refer to personal vitality (3:22; 14:30)
-          Moral and spiritual: ‘life’ often refers to spiritual fulfillment (8:35; 19:23; 3:18). The Proverbs do not seem to have eternity in view when using the term ‘life’ though two verses do point that direction (11:7; 14:32)
Death
-          The terms ‘death’ and ‘die’ show up 20 or thirty times in the book. Sheol appears 12 times along with Abaddon, the pit, and Rephaim (the shades). Few of these unquestionably refer only to literal death. Death “is the whole realm in conflict with life, rather than a single and merely physical event.”






av English Authorized Version (King James).
rv English Revised Version, 1885.
rsv American Revised Standard Version, 1952.
[1]Derek Kidner, vol. 17, Proverbs: An Introduction and Commentary (Originally published: Downers Grove, Ill. : InterVarsity Press, c1964.;, Tyndale Old Testament CommentariesDowners Grove, IL: InterVarsity Press, 1964), 39.

Monday, January 28, 2013

James 4:1-10 - A Plea for Purity


James 4:1-10 - A Plea for Purity

The epistle of James could be considered NT wisdom literature. Like the OT book of proverbs, it is filled with pithy practical statements, which can prove invaluable for those seeking to practice “pure religion” (1:27). Addressed to a Jewish audience, James reflects a Hebraic outlook – including heavy reliance on OT Scripture. One could easily imagine James writing with the Hebrew Scriptures in one hand and a pen in the other. Yet, this epistle is perhaps the most catholic of all the NT letters. 
Structure can be difficult to discern in this epistle. In fact, at times there seems to be no connection between adjoining units of thought. Practical godliness may be the one unifying theme. This epistle is not about theology proper. It is about theology incarnated.     
Presupposed
            I come to this text with a number of what I believe to be helpful presuppositions. Most importantly, I believe that the God who is Truth inspired all Scripture. I also believe the epistle of James to be Scripture. Therefore, I believe that the entire epistle of James is a true and authoritative word from God.
            I believe that language is one of God’s good gifts to us. Though He does use other means of revelation, our Lord has chosen reveal the particulars of His will through words. If God has spoken to us in Scripture in an intelligible way, all meanings cannot inhere within the text. I do believe that He has spoken to us meaningfully. I am optimistic concerning the understandability of the epistle.

            I come to this text as a believer. I am prepared to “be a doer” of these words. From within an obedient love relationship with God, I expect to understand His expectations as revealed in Bible doctrines (John 7:17; 1 Cor 2:9-16). Only within such a relationship can Scripture be understood as it ought to be understood (Zimmerman, 97-107).
Author/Text/Reader
The traditional view (beginning with Origen) is that this epistle was written by James, the brother of our Lord. Tradition (Josephus and Eusebius amongst the witnesses) also holds that he ultimately died a martyr’s death. If tradition is correct in this instance, we can conclude that the epistle was written prior to A.D. 62, when, according to Josephus, James was martyred (EBC, 162). James, the brother of our Lord, was raised in a godly Hebrew family in the town of Nazareth. There is much contention about exactly which of his phrases are Hebraisms. It is agreed, however, that he makes use of them. Apparently, he was quite familiar with both the Greek and Hebrew versions of the OT Scriptures (Adamson, 18-19). James’ pastoral passion shines throughout the epistle. He wants to see his readers put the “royal law” into action.
The vocabulary of this epistle consists of 570 words. Of these, 73 occur only here. It is believed that at least ten words of the letter were first coined by James himself. This text expects action. Within 108 verses are found over 50 imperatives (Adamson, 18-19).
The epistle assumes a Christian audience well-versed in the OT Scriptures. Shared theological understanding is largely assumed. Readers will be confounded by much of what James says if they do not bring these theological concepts with them to the text. The epistle is not introducing new concepts as much as it is challenging readers to obey what they already know. Right action is emphasized as a higher priority than right belief (2:19).
Literary Form
            James is considered epistolary literature. It is much more a general religious tract than are most of the NT letters. Its lack of unified argument and assortment of ethical admonitions make it look less like a letter than a sermon. Dibelius considered James to be a collection of homilies. And Luther went so far as to say that James guilty of ‘throwing things together…chaotically.’ Others, such as Adamson and P. B. Davids, have seen much more unity in the book (Moo, 38-40).
Though the entire NT is occasional, James is less occasional than perhaps any other NT book. It does not appear to be written to correct specific situations. It includes no personal greetings. And it ends abruptly, with no farewell.
Finally, the imagery of the book deserves mention. This epistle is filled with pictures – the rolling sea, flowering grass, a vapor, wars, a ship, a woman giving birth to sin, a mirror, a horse, wild animals, springs of water, a farmer, businessmen, people without food or cloths, a rich man with fancy clothes and a gold ring, rusted gold and silver, and moth-eaten clothes. The concrete imagery of the book adds to its power and appeal.  
Unit of Thought Under Consideration
            The focus in this paper is James 4:1-10. This unit of thought is typical of the general atmosphere of the epistle. The entire pericope is an exhortation to practical godliness. The OT is very much in the forefront. Hebraic expressions make an appearance. As usual, the writing is very direct.
Outline of James 4:1-10
I.                    Lust
a.      Lust is the source of contention
b.      Pray for the things you want
c.       Do not pray selfishly (a reason for unanswered prayers)
II.                  Love for the World
a.      Considered spiritual adultery
b.      Can be overcome by God’s grace
                                                              i.      Be humble
                                                            ii.      Submit to Him
                                                          iii.      Resist the devil
                                                           iv.      Draw nigh to God
1.      He will draw nigh to you
                                                             v.      Cleanse your hands
                                                           vi.      Purify your hearts
                                                         vii.      Be afflicted
1.      Mourn
2.      Weep
3.      Humble yourself
Verse by Verse
             Verse 1: From whence come wars and fightings among you? It is not hard to imagine the sort of wrangling that was taking place within those ancient communities. What is the source of such strife? Come they not hence, even of your lusts that war in your members? The word translated lusts is h`donw/n and refers to pleasure or enjoyment. Greek philosophers and diaspora Jews both disapproved of lives lived in pursuit of pleasure. Plato, Plutarch and Philo all considered wars to be the result of physical passions (Keener, 698). Following the example of the rabbis, James points to the physical members as the locus of the passions (Adamson, 166). These Christians failed to live harmoniously because they were living for pleasure rather than exhibiting the self-giving love exampled by our Savior.
            Verse 2: You lust, and have not: you kill, and desire to have, and cannot obtain: you fight and war, yet you have not, because you ask not. James makes good use of hyperbole in this verse. Their divisions are magnified to the point of absurdity, making the imprudence and ungodliness of their strivings plain to see. Rather than seeking good gifts from the God from whom every good gift descends (1:17), these wayward believers were greedily grasping for the things they perversely desired – and yet found no satisfaction. This lack of satisfaction, as it so often does, gave way to violence (143-146, Moo).
            Verse 3: You ask, and receive not, because you ask amiss that you may consume it upon your lusts. The depth of the covetousness buried within the hearts of those James addresses is a solemn warning of the extent to which sin can lead to delusion. These people were bringing their greed to God in the form of petitions. God wants us to make our requests known to Him, but, if our desires are selfish and destructive we cannot expect for Him to hear us. May the Lord preserve us from such self-deception.
            Verse 4: You adulterers and adulteresses, know you not that the friendship of the world is enmity with God? Apparently, copyists were confused by the original text which only referred to adulteresses and therefore added the masculine. However, the OT regularly refers to Israel as an unfaithful wife to God (e.g. Hos. 1-3) – explaining James’ use of the feminine alone. Adulteresses without the accompanying masculine counterpart is witnessed by Alexandrian and Western witnesses (Metzger, Textual Commentary on the Greek NT). According to the Expositor’s Greek Testament, “…the weight of the evidence is strongly in favor of this reading.” Regardless, the point remains the same – if you choose (boulhqh/|) to be a friend of the world (in NT generally refers to humanity in rebellion against God) you become the enemy of God.
            Verse 5: Do you think that the Scripture says in vain, The spirit that dwells in us lusts to envy? This text has been called “one of the most difficult in the epistle” (EBC, 193). NT writers sometimes interweaved various OT texts to suit their contemporary purposes (Keener, 699). This may be an example of such meshing. Though this quote does not exactly correspond to any OT text, the general idea is likely that conveyed in Exodus 20:5, 34:11, etc. The God who bought us with an infinite price earnestly desires to keep our devotion.
            Verse 6: But he gives more grace. Wherefore he says, God resists the proud, but gives grace to the humble. God’s jealous devotion to us (and the demands that come with it) is not a problem since he gives us more grace. James continues to demonstrate his internalization of the OT Scriptures, quoting Proverbs 3:34. This begins a call to action that is expected to produce responses from God Himself. James’ perspective is synergistic. Charles Hodge gives this helpful insight, “Sanctification does not exclude all cooperation” but instead demands “unremitting and strenuous exertion” (Oden, 215). The cooperation expected is not apart from God’s grace. As Arminius put it, “Free will is unable to begin or to perfect any true and spiritual good, without Grace.” (Olson, 144). This sort of cooperation is summarized by Paul in Philippians 2:12-13, “Work out your own salvation…For it is God who works in you both to will and to do his good pleasure.” Grace does not destroy freedom. Rather, “divine grace is most truly itself when it is enabling human freedom. God is both the source and goal of human freedom” (Wainwright, 84). Since God resists the proud, it behooves us to humble ourselves and receive greater grace.
            Verse 7: Submit yourselves therefore to God. The first step in the process of cooperating with grace in order to receive more grace is to submit to God. By yielding to His will we glorify God and draw grace to ourselves. Resist the devil, and he will flee from you. By submitting to God we resist the devil. Satan fell by pride and is constantly seeking to draw others away from God through pride and other folly. When the enemy sees that you are yielding to God he knows to fear the one who works in you.
            Verse 8: Draw nigh to God, and he will draw nigh to you. The theme of cooperation with divine grace continues. This drawing near is reminiscent of OT language referring to the activities of the priesthood (Ex. 19:22; Lev. 10:3; Ezek. 43:19; Adamson, 174). These verses do not prescribe a lazy fatalism. Earnest pursuit of God is rewarded. Those who hunger and thirst for righteousness will be filled (Mat. 5:6). Those who seek God with all their power will find him (Jer. 29:13). Cleanse your hands, you sinners; and purify your hearts, you double minded. In the OT, priests were to wash their hands when entering the tabernacle (Ex. 30:19). Anyone responsible for the shedding of blood (even if only guilty by association) was to wash their hands (Deut. 21:6). Now those who had defiled themselves through lust, envy, fighting, and friendship with the world are called to follow suit. A divided mind is contrasted with a pure heart. It is the pure in heart who will see God (Mat. 5:8). The double-minded cannot even expect to have their prayers answered (1:5-8). This “harsh diatribe rhetoric” (Keener, 699) is employed to bring God’s people to the purity that is essential to life with a holy God.
            Verse 9: Be afflicted, and mourn, and weep: let your laughter be turned to mourning, and your joy to heaviness. These pursuers of pleasure are now called to a zealous repentance. If they will replace their gusto for sin with an equally earnest repentance, there is hope for their souls.
            Verse 10: Humble yourselves in the sight of the Lord, and he shall lift you up. Orientals showed their repentant attitudes by rolling in the dust. When they felt that they had received forgiveness they would arise and cleanse themselves (Beacon, 234). This principle of humility before honor is found time and again throughout Holy Writ. Even our Lord humbled himself before He was exalted. If it was fitting for our Lord to abase Himself, how much more appropriate is it for those who have committed spiritual infidelity to humble themselves?
Conclusion
James has some hard words for us. Those who resist the temptation to reject such a pointed message will be rewarded with peace with God and neighbor. James reveals that, through specific, divinely ordained, methods, sin and strife can be overcome. Those who make use of their grace-enabled freedom to submit to God will be delivered from their oppressors and exalted in due time.






References
Adamson, James. (1976). The New International Commentary on the New Testament: James.
Eerdmans: Grand Rapids, MI
Burdick, Donald. (1981). The Expositor’s Bible Commentary: James. Zondervan: Grand Rapids,
MI
Harper, A. F. (1967). Beacon Bible Commentary: James. Beacon Hill Press of Kansas City: Kansas            City, KS
Keener, Craig. (1993). The IVP Bible Background Commentary: New Testament. InterVarsity
Press: Madison, WI
Moo, Douglas J. (1985). Tyndale New Testament Commentary: James. InterVarsity Press:            Downers Grove, IL
Oden, Thomas. (1992). Life In the Spirt: Systematic Theology: Volume Three. HarperCollins
Publishers: New York, NY
Olson, Roger. (2006). Arminian Theology: Myths and Realities. InterVarsity Press: Downers
Grove, IL
Wainwright, Geoffrey. (1980). Doxology: The Praise of God in Worship, Doctrine, and Life.
Oxford University Press: New York
Zimmermann, Jens. (2004). Recovering Theological Hermeneutics: An Incarnational-Trinitarian
Theory of Interpretation. Baker Academic: Grand Rapids, MI